"There must be a force more powerful than the black hole or the mother of all black holes that Hawkings has not considered."
As a warm up, see my earlier comments about black holes above ( previously
). The binding energy of huddling ultimatons may be just what we need to halt and reverse the collapse of stellar mass "black holes".
Worth noting that the idea of matter (e.g. a "neutron star") collapsing not to a black hole but to a "dark island" behind an event horizon (e.g. quark or preon star) is actively discussed. All this needs is another level of structure in the material hierarchy to provide another level of (quark / preon / ultimaton) degeneracy pressure.
But there is another reason for adding black holes to models: spiral galaxies
In a young, big-banged universe, physicists had to invent supermassive
black holes (SMBH) to do two jobs: (1) get spiral galaxies started quickly, and (2) power the discs and jets we can see at the center of those spirals. But if we are to believe what the revelators imply regarding (the mother of all) explosions at the limiting and critical point of ultimatonic condensation (during stellar collapse), then for me, the question is: how much mass can be accumulated in one place? Textbooks propose no energy source able to resist the collapse of more than the theoretical 2 or 3 solar masses of the TOV (Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff) limit. So once a neutron star accumulates more than this limit, it must collapse.
Unless the ultimaton is real.
While the unimaginable-but-necessary binding energy between huddling ultimatons serves nicely to explain certain gamma ray bursts, this raises a question: if there is a low limit to the accumulation of matter (say 10 - 100 solar masses), then what is doing the (very necessary) job of (hypothetical) supermassive black holes at the center of spiral galaxies?
Well, the UB does state, without missing a beat, that the (pre-photonic, i.e. dark) massive disk-halos necessary for spiral galaxies to work are spun up by Force Organizers
. So which is the better explanation: SMBH or superfluid vortex on transcendental axis? Both mechanisms should be able to spin up accretion disks, and to power those fabulous light shows...
Regarding earlier comments about Higgs/mass:
The fact that some particles are observed to have a response to a particular type of gravity is not well explained by current theories. The "Higgs mechanism
" is one attempt to fix this. This mechanism requires certain other particles (e.g. various bosons), and the blip noticed recently at CERN is consistent with such a particle appearing and disappearing during a collision.
However, the idea of that all matter is built from some kind of "pre-on" (such as the UB's ultimaton) is far more interesting (and mathematically consistent). The reason such models fell out of favour a few decades back is that the energy density implied by huddling preons, or ultimatons, was too big to fit in with existing theories. But such energy density would fit nicely in a model that unzips black holes with a brief squirt of gamma rays.
Regarding "unearned knowledge", this limitation only applies to things that we can discover or work out for ourselves. If the ultimaton is technically undiscoverable, then maybe they were free to tell us about it?
Regarding time, remember that time is a necessary technique for the finite to work. To get a conceptual grip on time, how about we look at how the finite is managed: enter the Seven Master Spirits
. Consider the way these guys are (in a sense) "anchored" near peripheral Paradise, yet they supervise seven finites that evolve in isolation. For me, the way they link their finite nests with a more-than-finite context implies that somehow their motion imposes an "arrow of time" on their membranes of creation.
Picture their presence in motion through absolutely ultimate space, in stately circulation about Paradise. Could this synchronized and Paradise-relative motion (of a highly qualified domain) actually cause
Regarding the relativity of time: remember how chronoldeks -- as "barometers" of energy quality and density -- are required for indicating local rates of flow of time? If we see time as absonitely artificial, then no wonder its rate of flow is a function of circumstance.
On another note - descriptions of the master universe, from paradise, havona, the super universes and the four outer space levels always suggests expansion and that motion is eliptical and somewhat flat (flat being relative and is my assumption based on reading) - similar to viewing a galaxy? But not spherical, no reference to spherical that I can find. If this be the case, what would you suppose that space - perpendicular to the plane of the seven universe components would be referred to as - just another outer space level? Part of the existing outer space levels?
This takes us to a discussion of the topology and differential geometry of absolutely ultimate space. While this is above my pay-grade, I do love to waffle on about it...